A comparison of nuclear power and coal power

Capital costs Costs associated with initial construction of the plant and the modifications. For a nuclear plant, these costs include the surcharge levied by the Department of Energy for ultimate storage of the high level waste.

Eventually it is expected that most, if not all, PWRs will have to replace steam generators prior to the end of their NRC operating license. Can be started easily. For a nuclear plant these may be higher than for other energy forms because the buildings used for containment or for safety-related equipment must meet higher standards than the traditional structures.

Greenhouse Gas Effect of Coal-Burning Plants Coal-fired electric power plants emit massive amounts of greenhouse gases and other harmful pollutants to the atmosphere on a daily basis.

In general, the United States government has promoted inexpensive energy by taxing energy use at lower rates than in a number of other countries.

Which One Is Better for the Environment: Coal or Nuclear?

Some PWRs have had to replace steam generators. Located where a large amount of water can be collected easily in a reservoir by constructing a dam. If nuclear is not used, where is the electrical power to come from; how much of a cost increase is the customer willing to pay.

The heavy, unstable atoms of uranium and plutonium, both common nuclear fuels, decay into lighter elements while generating abundant heat.

Comparison of Various Power Plants

Nuclear energy does not produce air pollution like coal energy. Also, following the Three Mile Island event inthe NRC mandated a number of plant design changes for plants coming on line. That residue forms a toxic mess with pollutants such as arsenic, cadmium, chromium and mercury See Reference 5.

Waste Disposal A typical coal-burning power plant creates overtons of waste ash and sludge each year. Transportation costs are high for coal because of the amount of material needed to generate the same energy as the nuclear fuel.

On the other hand, coal plants are required to include scrubbers to remove airborne pollutants as sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides, and particulates. This results in less pollution due to the transportation of fuel.

Uranium U and other radioactive metals. The reactor design of most operating nuclear plants requires the constant flow of water to keep the reactor from overheating and possibly releasing radioactivity into the environment; the Fukushima disaster in happened when water pumps failed.

Greenhouse Gas Effect of Nuclear Power Plants Nuclear power plants emit no carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, or other toxic gases. Hard Choices While a nuclear power plant is completely safe under ideal conditions, the failure of a poorly designed facility in Chernobyl led to the world's largest single eco-disaster.

He writes poems and short stories whenever he's not immersed in a book.

Which One Is Better for the Environment: Coal or Nuclear?

For a coal plant this is ash. A nuclear power plant does not use chemical reactions to produce energy; during normal operations, it has no gaseous emissions.

Materials costs include replacement parts, computer parts, expendable office and other supplies. Parts of the plant could be used for energy generation by other sources.

It works on Modified Rankine Cycle. Radioactive waste is produced. Water Availability of Fuel: According to the University of Florida, a 1 gigawatt coal-fired power plant requires 9, tons of fuel per day; an equivalent nuclear plant consumes about 3 kilograms 6.

Also, energy costs rose which had a significant impact on inflation. This includes the costs of: A small amount of fuel is used, so transportation costs are less. Following the Arab oil embargoes in andthere was considerable emphasis on energy conservation.

Other questions to address are: Why should lower efficiency applications be used. These are the questions that should be answered by federal legislators and state utility regulatory agencies. A nuclear power plant does not use chemical reactions to produce energy; during normal operations, it has no gaseous emissions.

Eventually it is expected that most, if not all, PWRs will have to replace steam generators prior to the end of their NRC operating license.

The Efficiency of Power Plants of Different Types

Also, energy costs rose which had a significant impact on inflation. It is located at a site where coal, water and transportation facilities are available easily.

nuclearinfo.net

By contrast, nuclear reactors exploit the heat of radioactivity. Some coastal plants, however, discharge heated water back to lakes and seas, and this heat eventually radiates into surface warming. Because of the drop in expected energy demand, utilities delayed plants under construction, many of which were nuclear and had long lead times for completion.

Nuclear power generation originated with the discovery of nuclear fission, the splitting of uranium atoms.

Coal Energy vs. Nuclear Energy

When fission occurs, huge amounts of energy are released, and the heat generation can create steam to spin turbines, similar to the way electricity is. Comparisons of various energy sources As the world's population increases and there is continued comparison to the current western European, Japanese, and North American living standards, there is likely to be demand for more electrical power.

It is equivalent to the past 35 years of CO 2 emissions from coal burning in the U.S. or 17 years in China (ref. 3) — i.e., historical nuclear energy production has prevented the building of hundreds of large coal-fired power plants.

Like coal power, nuclear power is economical and does not fluctuate as much as wind or solar power. Unlike coal, it is considered clean in terms of the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced by the power plant itself, although uranium mining and processing are not.

Nuclear and fossil fuel-burning power plants differ mainly in where their energy comes from; a nuclear reactor produces heat from radioactive metals, and a fossil-fuel plant burns coal, oil or natural gas. Comparison of Various Power Plants by Kiran Daware Power System.

Coal is heavy and has to be transported to the plant. Initial Cost of Plant: Lower than Hydroelectric and Nuclear power plants. Running Costs: Higher than Hydroelectric and Nuclear power plants.

Maintenance Costs: High. Skilled engineers and staff are needed.

A comparison of nuclear power and coal power
Rated 3/5 based on 60 review
The pros and cons of nuclear power versus coal | Suzuki Elders